[JoeGuardsman]

This site has a quite a few titles already and I'm not really trying to start a new one, especially since I'm still pretty new...though I guess it would be cool. I want to put together a good group of people who know what they are talking about to prosecute and defend rules interpretations. When I say "know what they are talking about" I don't mean right and wrong, I mean display an ablility to present a cogent arguement.
1. I think that one issue can be brought up on the order of between one week and one month and should be brought up as a statement. It is easiest to declare Prosecutor or Defender if it is a statement. So please even if you don't believe the statement phrase it that way.
2. Each topic should have it's own thread so as to avoid confusion and 15 page threads.
3. When you first post a reply to an issue declare that you are a Prosecutor or a Defender and make your best attempt to prove your point. No fence-sitters, your job is to be Judges after the cases have been presented at that point please vote.
4. This is going to be competitive but do not make personal attacks, disassemble an arguement but do not attack the person (this includes calling the person a cheater...I have been culprit before.) There are no cheaters in this arguement just people who believe something else and so I want you to convince them nicely of your opinion instead.

Please help me create rules for this system as well as to raise new issues.

If you wish to join in this is the sign-up page. I will probably need a moderator if it does succeed so that we can keep everything above the belt.

Thank you in advance if you like the idea,

JoeGuardsman

If Rules Lawyers are defence attorneys looking to work the system then I'm the prosecutor.