![]() | ![]() | |||
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Conscript ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| So I have a question because I have wanted to start a chaos army (both astartes and guard) and am torn between a tzeentch style army (with my own background set up) OR an undivided and just design the entire army from the ground up (which when I think about it sounds more apealing) any thoughts? by the by already play both IG and SM so... time for some mean spiky guys. its that or the new DE codex is coming so... |
| | |
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| High Lord of Terra ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
As for the Chaos... I am a bit biased towards Tzeentch at the moment. Though I have played Death Gaurd(nurgle) in the past. I love the Tzeentch models and the rules are pretty sweet. AP 3 Bolters with 4+ invunerable save is always nice. My suggestion would be to read up as much as you can on Chaos and go from there. There is no reason you can't use the rules for Tzeentch, but make up your own chapter. Just my two cents, Servo | |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Corporal ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Texas
Posts: 286
Rep Power: 1 ![]() Thanks: 17
Thanked 33 Times in 32 Posts
| i would actually do both gaming punk, like u could do a Thousand sons army and then u could build an undivided army from the ground up, but thats just me, |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Conscript ![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 17
Rep Power: 0 ![]() Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| thanks both. I need more money but I'll most liuely buy teh new codex to start looking at a list. I need to move so money is abit tight. and having jsut ordered DKoK models I need to save a little bit. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Captain ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,571
Rep Power: 2 ![]() Thanks: 59
Thanked 111 Times in 91 Posts
| Tzeentch is tough and shooty but slow (with fearless units in the form of 1k Sons), whilst Undivided has more options and has a nice re-roll morale if you take Icons of Chaos Glory. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| High Lord of Terra ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Quote:
my two cents, Servo | |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| One of strangess ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Turn around... (if I'm not there I'm usually in Bangladesh)
Posts: 1,876
Rep Power: 2 ![]() Thanks: 166
Thanked 51 Times in 46 Posts
| I like undivided because the best (IHMO) unit in the entire CSM army is the Standard CSM Squad. What I can I say? I like CSM. Not to mention I think Thousand Sons are too expesnive points wise. Don't ask why, but I don't like the idea of a single wound sorceror in every single one of my troop squads. If I were to get a cult unit appart from my plaguemarines it'd be Noise Marines or 'zerkers... never Ksons.
__________________ ![]() Proud member of the FSBGEBS: Feed Stitch Before Getting Eaten By Stitch, Protecting the 40kterra community from a ravenous Stitch. My Blog, my life, my strangeness My WRFP campaign blog! He is no fool who gives that which he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot lose - Jim Elliot Life, don't me started on life - Marvin the Robot |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Destruction Manifest ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Loyall, Kentucky
Posts: 2,647
Rep Power: 3 ![]() Thanks: 70
Thanked 94 Times in 72 Posts
Blog Entries: 1 | If you like shooty, Tzeentch is the way to go. Plus they are tough. I suggest making your own warband, with some 1kSons sprinkled in.
__________________ “Nothing you can lose by dying is half so precious as the readiness to die, which is a man’s charter of nobility.” George Santayana. |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Destruction Manifest ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: Loyall, Kentucky
Posts: 2,647
Rep Power: 3 ![]() Thanks: 70
Thanked 94 Times in 72 Posts
Blog Entries: 1 | I'd like to see someone do Tzeentch based army with lots of Oblits and shooty Termies, and some Daemons and Spawn.
__________________ “Nothing you can lose by dying is half so precious as the readiness to die, which is a man’s charter of nobility.” George Santayana. |
| | |